Pedagogical pathways towards 2030: The proposal of a model for the Ecuadorian education system

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32719/26312816.2020.4.1.0

Keywords:

Pedagogical model, Public education, Co-design, Action research

Abstract

In this editorial, we provide an overview of the Pedagogical pathways towards the 2030 project carried out by the Ministry of Education of Ecuador with the Organization of Ibero-American States and the Simón Bolívar Andean University during the second semester of 2020. The project was to define a flexible proposal for a pedagogical model that could serve as a reference for joint activity design in public educational institutions. The model was developed through co-design and action research processes in which key actors from the Ministry, institutions, and teachers of the public system were involved. As a result, a model proposal was obtained that was adapted and adopted in eight educational institutions in the country with different outcomes, revealing its potential and defining a set of strategies to face its limitations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Miguel Ángel Herrera Pavo, Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, sede Ecuador. Quito, Ecuador.

His professional development has been mainly in the field of education and international cooperation. Psychopedagogue and doctor in the Information and Knowledge Society. He has worked as a manager, professor, and researcher in various public and private, national, and international institutions; venturing into the fields of evaluation, curriculum, e-learning, intercultural bilingual education, teacher training, educational inclusion, and gender in education. He has worked in the Ministry of Education as National Director of Educational Standards, National Director of Curriculum, Undersecretary of Educational Foundations, and Vice Minister of Education. Currently, he is a research professor in the Education Area of the Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Ecuador; He also collaborates as a teacher in the Master of Education and ICT at the Open University of Catalonia; and is editor of the Andean Journal of Education.

Yadhira Espinoza-Weaver, Iberoamerican States Organization. Quito, Ecuador.

Engineer in Business Administration and Master in Education with a Neuroscience specialty from the San Francisco de Quito University. Her work experience spans various public and private institutions. For 11 years, she has worked in the Organization of Ibero-American States for Education, Science and Culture-OEI-Ecuador Office, of which she is currently its project coordinator.

Graciela Mariana Rivera Bilbao la Vieja, Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador. Quito, Ecuador.

Master in Education from the San Francisco de Quito University. National Director of Curriculum of the Ministry of Education of Ecuador.

José Daniel Espinosa Rodríguez, Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar. Quito, Ecuador.

Pedagogue from the National Autonomous University of Mexico and Master's Degree in Research in Education from the Simón Bolívar Andean University. Coordinator of Educational Evaluation and Innovation at the UTE University and teacher in the Education Area of ​​the Simón Bolívar Andean University. He has worked in the public sector performing in various positions within the National Institute of Educational Evaluation, such as Technical Evaluation Coordinator and General Technical Coordinator, and Director of Evaluation Model and Structures. He was also an official advisor for the National Secretariat for Higher Education, Science and Technology and was in charge of the National Entrance Exam for Higher Education (ENES). He was Coordinator of the Postgraduate Entrance Exam for the professional profile and head of the Unit for the Preparation of Reagents in the Deputy General Directorate of Entrance Exams DGAEXANI of the National Evaluation Center for Higher Education, Ceneval, Mexico.

Verónica Orellana Navarrete, Escuela Politécnica Nacional. Quito, Ecuador.

PhD candidate in the Technological Management Program at National Polytechnic School, Master in e-business and ICT for management of the Polytechnic of Turin, Higher Specialist in Education and NTIC by the Simón Bolívar Andean University, Higher Diploma in Management for University Learning by the Army Polytechnic School of the Army. Education and ICT consultant, trainer and university teacher. External evaluator in various processes developed by the Council for the Quality Assurance of Higher Education of Ecuador.

References

Aguavil Arévalo, J. M., & Andino Jaramillo, R. A. (2019). Necesidades formativas de docentes de Educación Intercultural Tsáchila. Alteridad. Revista de Educación, 14(1), 78-88. doi:10.17163/alt.v14n1.2019.06

Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132-169. doi:10.3102/0034654311404435

Avecillas Almeida, J. I. (2019). Estudio comparativo de las propuestas epistemológicas curriculares en Educación Básica ecuatoriana durante el periodo 1996-2019. CIEG, 40, 138-144.

Baran, E., Correia, A.-P., & Thompson, A. D. (2013). Tracing Successful Online Teaching in Higher Education: Voices of Exemplary Online Teachers. Teachers College Record, 115(3).

Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2016). Perspectivas y desafíos de los enfoques del aprendizaje basados en la indagación. En La naturaleza del aprendizaje: Usando la investigación para inspirar la práctica (pp. 158-183). Panamá: OCDE, OIE-UNESCO, UNICEF

Bautista, G. (2017). Intervención psicopedagógica para la mejora de la práctica educativa. Barcelona: UOC.

Bautista, G., & Borges, F. (2013). Smart Classrooms: Innovation in formal learning spaces to transform learning experiences. Bulletin of the IEEE Technical Committee on Learning Technology, 15(3), 4.

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom. Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. ISTE, ASCD.

Blomkvist, J., & Segelström, F. (2014). Benefits of External Representations in Service Design: A Distributed Cognition Perspective. The Design Journal, 17(3), 331-346. doi:10.2752/175630614X13982745782849

Bolívar, A., Segovia, J. D., Escudero, J. M., García Gómez, R., & González, M. T. (2007). Asesoría Pedagógica: El centro como contexto de Innovación [Documento en línea]. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia.

Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846-860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x

Broad, J. H. (2015). So many worlds, so much to do: Identifying barriers to engagement with continued professional development for teachers in the further education and training sector. London Review of Education, 13(1), 16-30. doi:10.18546/LRE.13.1.03

Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming Critical: Education Knowledge and Action Research. Falmer Press.

Castellano Gil, J. M., Stefos, E., & Fajardo, Á. (2019). Implementación de modelos pedagógicos en Ecuador: Un estudio de caso. Revista de Historia, Patrimonio, Arqueología y Antropología Americana, 1, 88-116.

CIDA, Intermón Oxfam, Ucodep, & Inizjamed. (2008). La Educación para una ciudadanía global en la escuela de hoy [Documento en línea].

Coll Salvador, C. (1985). Acción, interacción y construcción del conocimiento en situaciones educativas. Anuario de Psicologia, 33(2), 61-70.

Coll Salvador, C. (1996). Constructivismo y educación escolar: Ni hablamos siempre de lo mismo, ni lo hacemos siempre desde la misma perspectiva. Anuario de Psicología, 69, 153-178.

Coll Salvador, C. (2001). Constructivismo y educación: La concepción constructivista de la enseñanza y el aprendizaje. En C. Coll, J. Palacios, & Á. Marchesi, Desarrollo psicológico de la educación. Vol. 2. Psicología de la educación escolar (pp. 157-186). Madrid: Alianza.

Colomina, R., Onrubia, J., & Rochera, J. M. (2001). Interactividad, mecanismos de influencia educativa y construcción del conocimiento en el aula. En C. Coll, J. Palacios, & Á. Marchesi, Desarrollo psicológico y educación (pp. 437-460). Madrid: Alianza.

Galeana de la O, L. (2016). Aprendizaje basado en proyectos [Documento en línea].

Galvis, Á. H., & Duart, J. M. (2020). Uso transformador de tecnologías digitales en educación superior. Bogotá: Ediciones Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia y RedUnete. doi:10.16925/9789587602456

Garrote-Rojas, D., Arenas, J. Á., & Jiménez-Fernández, S. (2018). Educación intercultural en el aula: profesorado y TIC. Prisma Social, 22, 326-345.

Ghiraldelli, P. (2017). O que é pedagogia. San Pablo: Editora Brasiliense.

Gimeno Sacristán, J., Santos, M., Torres, J., Jackson, P., & Marrero, Ja. (2015). Ensayos sobre el curriculum: Teoría y práctica. Madrid: Morata.

Giroux, H. (1986). Teorías de la reproducción y la resistencia en la nueva sociología de la educación:Un análisis crítico. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 53(17). doi:10.17227/01203916.5140

Hamada, T., & Scott, K. (2000). Anthropology and International Education Via the Internet: A Collaborative Learning Model. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 6(1). doi:10.3998/3336451.0006.105

Han, B.-C. (22 de marzo, 2020). Coronavirus: La emergencia viral y el mundo de mañana [Artículo de periódico]. Elpaís.

Hargreaves, A., & O´Connor, M. (2018). Collaborative professionalism. Londrés: SAGE.

Herrera Pavo, M. Á., & Cochancela Patiño, M. G. (2020). Aportes de las reformas curriculares a la educación obligatoria en el Ecuador. Revista Scientific, 5(15), 362-383. doi:10.29394/Scientific.issn.2542-2987.2020.5.15.19.362-383

Holmlid, S., Mattelmäki, T., Visser, F. S., & Vaajakallio, K. (2015). Co-creative Practices in Service Innovation. En R. Agarwal, W. Selen, G. Roos, & R. Green (Eds.), The Handbook of Service Innovation (pp. 545-574). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-6590-3_25

Jiménez Carvajal, V. R. (2017). Modelo pedagógico para el desarrollo de programas educativos con componente virtual, dirigidos a adultos de zonas rurales centroamericanas [Tesis Doctoral]. Universitat de les Illes Balears

Jolonch, A., & Martínez, M. (2020). Liderazgo para el aprendizaje: Estudio de investigación. Barcelona: UOC.

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014a). Doing Critical Participatory Action Research: The ‘Planner’ Part. En S. Kemmis, R. McTaggart, & R. Nixon (Eds.), The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research (pp. 85-114). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2_5

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014b). Introducing Critical Participatory Action Research. En S. Kemmis, R. McTaggart, & R. Nixon (Eds.), The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research (pp. 1-31). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2_1

Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: A review of the multidisciplinary application of experiential learning theory in higher education [Documento en línea].

Kuhn, T. (1971). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43. doi:10.2307/1183338

Law, J. (1994). Organising Modernity: Social Ordering and Social Theory. Wiley-Blackwell.

Law, J., & Singleton, V. (2005). Object Lessons. Organization, 12(3), 331-355. doi:10.1177/1350508405051270

Leonard, P., McLaren, P., Freire, P., Macedo, D., & West, C. (1992). Paulo Freire: A Critical Encounter. Taylor & Francis Group.

López Costa, M. (2019). The Integration of Digital Devices into Learning Spaces According to the Needs of Primary and Secondary Teachers. TEM Journal, 8(4), 8. doi:10.18421/TEM84-36

Mauri, T., & Onrubia, J. (2008). El profesor en entornos virtuales: Condiciones, perfil y competencias. En C. Coll & C. Monereo, Psicología de la educación virtual (pp. 132-152). Madrid: Morata.

McLaren, P. (2015). Life in Schools: An Introduction to Critical Pedagogy in the Foundations of Education. Londres: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315633640

Mol, A. (1999). Ontological Politics. A Word and Some Questions. The Sociological Review, 47, 74-89. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03483.x

Morales-Caruncho, X., & Chacón-Gordillo, P. (2018). Percepción y conocimiento de dos grupos de futuros docentes de Educación Primaria sobre la Educación Artística y las competencias que desarrolla. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 23(77), 527-546.

Morin, E. (2005). El paradigma perdido. Barcelona: Kairós.

Narváez Yar, K., & Herrera Pavo, M. Á. (2020). Política de formación profesional continua implementada en Ecuador entre 2007 y 2017. 593 Digital Publisher CEIT, 5(1), 18-35. doi:10.33386/593dp.2020.1.178

Ocaña, A. O. (2013). Modelos pedagógicos y teorías del aprendizaje. Bogotá: Ediciones de la U.

Ospina Botero, M. (2015). El reto de la escuela: Profundizar su relación con la comunidad Escuela y comunidad. Zona Próxima, 22, 236-249.

Perrenaud, P. (2004a). Desarrollar la práctica reflexiva en el oficio de enseñar. Barcelona: Graó.

Perrenaud, P. (2004b). Diez nuevas competencias para enseñar. Barcelona: Graó.

Ramonet, I. (29 de abril, 2020). Coronavirus: La pandemia y el sistema-mundo [Página web]. Página12.

Rodríguez-Sandoval, E., Vargas-Solano, É. M., & Luna-Cortés, J. (2010). Evaluación de la estrategia “aprendizaje basado en proyectos”. Educación y Educadores, 13(1), 13-25.

Royle, K. (2021). What’s Good What’s Bad? Conceptualising Teaching and Learning Methods as Technologies Using Actor Network Theory in the Context of Palestinian Higher Education. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(1), 120-143. doi:10.1007/s42438-020-00138-z

Rychen, D. S., & Salganic, L. H. (2003). A holistic model of competence. En Key Competencies for a Successful Life and Well-Functioning Society (pp. 41-62). Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber.

Sanders, E., & Stappers, P. J. (2012). Convivial toolbox: Generative research for the front end of design. BIS.

Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional Ecology, `Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387-420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001

Talbert, R. (2012). Inverted Classroom. Colleagues, 9(1).

Torres-Santomé, J. (2014). Organización de los contenidos y relevancia cultural. Cuadernos de Pedagogía, 447, 50-53.

Tucker, B. (4 de octubre, 2011). The Flipped Classrrom: Online instruction at home frees class time for learning [Página web]. What Next.

UNESCO, & UNICEF. (2008). Un enfoque de la Educación para todos basado en los derechos humanos. París: UNICEF.

Valencia, C., & Hernández, O. (2017). El Diseño Universal para el Aprendizaje, una alternativa para la inclusión educativa en Chile. Atenas, 4(40).

Visser, F. S., Stappers, P. J., van der Lugt, R., & Sanders, E. B.-N. (2005). Contextmapping: Experiences from practice. CoDesign, 1(2), 119-149. doi:10.1080/15710880500135987

Published

2021-04-14

How to Cite

Herrera Pavo, M. Ángel, Espinoza-Weaver, Y., Rivera Bilbao la Vieja, G. M., Espinosa Rodríguez, J. D., & Orellana Navarrete, V. (2021). Pedagogical pathways towards 2030: The proposal of a model for the Ecuadorian education system. Andean Journal of Education, 4(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.32719/26312816.2020.4.1.0
Métricas alternativas

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>