Mediocracy and Pandemic: Metropolitan Newspapers and Political Power in Quarantine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32719/26312514.2023.7.1

Keywords:

Agenda setting, intermedia agenda, mediocracy, requency, relevance, correlation

Abstract

The work develops the phenomenon of mediocracy through the Intermedia Agenda of the most representative graphic media of the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires (Clarín, La Nación, Página/12, Crónica and Diario Popular).The objective of the study is to analyze the relationship between the ruling elite and the media for the imposition of themes through the front pages of newspapers during the first period of the pandemic, considering the reading contract relevant to each newspaper. The importance of the topic and its justification are based on the opportunity to analyze the relationship between two members of Political Communication - the media and the ruling elite - through the Media Agenda in times of health crisis. The research has its center of gravity in the Agenda Setting Theory, starting from what to think - First Level of Agenda Setting - through the media agenda of the graphic media. What stands out is the coincidence of interests between political power and the media as actors of Political Communication to present an issue
to be debated in society, as long as it is a threat to the system. In this way, the effects of the Media Agenda on citizenship emphasize the situation when an event is directly experienced (obstrusive issues).The relationship between the ruling Elites and the media that are shown are not only presented as generators of consensus, but also as legitimizers of political actions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Casermeiro, Alicia. 2004. Los medios en las elecciones: Agenda setting en la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Buenos Aires: Universidad Católica Argentina. https://bit.ly/3FkFchV.

Ford, Aníbal. 1994. Navegaciones: Comunicación, cultura, crisis. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu. https://bit.ly/3gRLkEO.

—. 2005. Resto del mundo: Nuevas mediaciones de las agendas críticas internacionales. Buenos Aires: Norma. https://bit.ly/3FowCiu.

—, y Stella Martini. 1996. “Acontecimientos, noticia, agenda” [apuntes de cátedra]. En Producción de la noticia: Agenda y newsmaking, compilado por Aníbal Ford y Stella Martini. Buenos Aires: Centro de Estudiantes de Ciencias Sociales de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (CECSo).

Gandy, Oscar. 1982. Beyond Agenda Setting: Information Subsidies and Public Policy. Norwood (NJ), US: Ablex Publishing Company. https://bit.ly/3eUjLcZ.

Gomis, Lorenzo. 1991. Teoría del periodismo: Cómo se forma el presente. Barcelona: Paidós. https://bit.ly/3TKXxcn.

Kosicki, Gerald. 1993. “Problems and Opportunities in Agenda-Setting Research”. Journal of Communications 43 (2): 100-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01265.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01265.x

Luchessi, Lila, y María Rodríguez, coords. 2007. Fronteras globales: Cultura, política y medios de comunicación. Buenos Aires: La Crujía. https://bit.ly/3FnVgzJ.

Martini, Stella. 1997. “Periodismo en los 90: El trabajo sobre una nueva agenda pública”. En Periodistas: Entre el protagonismo y el riesgo, compilado por Alicia Entel, 147-62. Buenos Aires: Paidós. https://bit.ly/3TKpqBg.

—. 1999. “El sensacionalismo y las agendas sociales”. Diálogos de la Comunicación 55: 54-65. https://bit.ly/3SRbDIc.

—. 2000. Periodismo, noticia y noticiabilidad. Buenos Aires: Norma. https://bit.ly/3TIsZIn.

—. 2007. “Agenda de la sociedad y agenda de los medios: Cuando lo transnacional atraviesa la vida cotidiana”. En Fronteras globales: Cultura, política y medios de comunicación, coordinado por Lila Luchessi y María Rodríguez, 113-41. Buenos Aires: La Crujía. https://bit.ly/3FnVgzJ.

—, y Jorge Gobbi. 1998. “La agenda de los medios y el reconocimiento del público: Una propuesta de discusión” [apuntes de cátedra]. En Agendas periodísticas y agendas sociales, compilado por Aníbal Ford y Stella Martini. Buenos Aires: CECSo.

McCombs, Maxwell. 1981. “Setting the Agenda for Agenda-Setting Research: An Assesment of the Priority Ideas and Problems”. En Mass Communication Review Yearbook, vol. 2, editado por G. Cleveland Wilhoit, 209-11. Beverly Hills, US: Sage. https://bit.ly/3H4jIqq.

—. 1992. “Explorers and Surveyors: Expanding Strategies for Agenda Setting Research”. Journalism

Quarterly 69 (4): 813-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909206900402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909206900402

—. 1999. “Personal Involvement with Issues on the Public Agenda”. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 2 (2): 152-68. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/11.2.152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/11.2.152

—. 2002. “The Agenda-Setting Role of the Mass Media in the Shaping of Public Opinion” [apuntes de cátedra]. En El caso de la agenda atributiva: Una propuesta desde diferentes autores, compilado por Stella Martini y L. Saubidet. Buenos Aires: CECSo. https://bit.ly/3imVai6.

—. 2004. Estableciendo la agenda. Buenos Aires: Paidós. https://bit.ly/3U1Kwea.

—, y Donald Shaw. 1972. “The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media”. Public Opinion Quarterly 36 (2): 176-87. https://bit.ly/3sEdJ3a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/267990

—, y Donald Shaw. 1993. “The Evolution of Agenda Setting Research: Twenty Five Years in the Marketplace of Ideas”. Journal of Communication 43 (2): 58-67. https://bit.ly/3gRm8hJ. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01262.x

Neuman, W. Russell. 1990. “The threshold of public attention”. Public Opinion Quarterly 54 (2): 159-76. https://doi.org/10.1086/269194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/269194

O’Shaughnessy, Nicholas. 1990. The Phenomenon of Political Marketing. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan. https://bit.ly/3f7jtzD. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10352-2

Roberts, Marilyn, y Maxwell McCombs. 1994. “Agenda Setting and Political Advertising: Origins of the News Agenda”. Political Communication 11: 249-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1994.9963030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1994.9963030

Sádaba, Teresa. 2007. Framing: El encuadre de las noticias. El binomio terrorismo-medios. Buenos Aires: La Crujía. https://bit.ly/3sBJhqt.

Schechter, Danny. 2004. Las noticias en tiempos de guerra. Medios de comunicación: ¿Información o propaganda? Barcelona: Paidós. https://bit.ly/3DNOamZ.

Takeshita, Toshio. 1997. “Exploring the Media’s Roles in Defining Reality: From Issue-Agenda Setting to Attribute-Agenda Setting”. En Communication and Democracy: Exploring the Intellectual Frontiers in Agenda-Setting Theory, editado por Maxwell McCombs, Donald Shaw y David Weaver, 15-27.

Mahwah (NJ), US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. http://shorturl.at/bfjTU.

Verón, Eliseo. 2001. El cuerpo de las imágenes. Buenos Aires: Norma. https://bit.ly/3SEP8pz.

Vilches, Lorenzo. 1989. Manipulación de la información televisiva. Barcelona: Paidós. https://bit.ly/3NdjuhS.

Wolf, Mauro. 1987. La investigación de la comunicación de masas. Buenos Aires: Paidós. https://bit.ly/3sAklzx.

Wolton, Dominique. 1998. “Los medios, eslabón débil de la comunicación política”. En El nuevo espacio público, 183-200. Barcelona: Gedisa. https://bit.ly/3U2jtiX.

Published

2023-02-15

How to Cite

Fontana, W. (2023). Mediocracy and Pandemic: Metropolitan Newspapers and Political Power in Quarantine. Uru: Revista De Comunicación Y Cultura, (7), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.32719/26312514.2023.7.1
Métricas alternativas