Comparison of Connected and Disconnected Activities in the Teaching of Computational Thinking to Future Teachers

Main Article Content

Gonzalo Donoso Gormaz
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7224-443X

Abstract

This study addresses a crucial challenge for teacher training in Latin America: the integration of Computational Thinking into the curriculum of future mathematics teachers. Given the digital divide and limited technological resources, this study investigates whether unplugged pedagogical strategies (without the use of devices) are as effective as computer-mediated approaches in developing this essential competency. Through a pre-experimental design with 65 teaching students from a private Chilean university during the second semester of 2024, the impact on CT learning of two modalities was compared: practical workshops with digital resources versus dynamics that did not require technology. The data, collected through a validated questionnaire, revealed no significant differences in learning outcomes between the two groups. The main finding, that both methodologies are equally effective, has direct and high-impact applicability for teacher training programs in the region. It suggests that technological infrastructure barriers can be overcome through the use of non-computational activities, offering cost-effective and easy-to-implement alternatives. These conclusions validate the diversification of teaching strategies, promoting equitable access to the development of fundamental digital skills for the 21st century.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Research

Author Biography

Gonzalo Donoso Gormaz, Universidad Católica Silva Henríquez

Professor of Mathematics and Educational Informatics, Master in Mathematics, Master in Education, Master in University Teaching and Doctor in Education in the line of Mathematics and Curriculum, with extensive experience in the subject at the secondary and university education level. Implementation of active learning methodologies, in addition to strengthening students' skills with the use of technological tools. He has experience as coordinator of mathematics academies, Microsoft and head of mathematics department. He has also participated in the development of programs in subjects in the area of ​​mathematics in higher courses at the AIEP Professional Institute, as well as an instructional designer in the area of ​​mathematics and evaluation.
Ability to work as a team, under pressure, excellent level of interpersonal relationships and adaptation to various teaching-learning methodologies in various educational contexts, whether at secondary or higher level.

How to Cite

Donoso Gormaz, G. (2025). Comparison of Connected and Disconnected Activities in the Teaching of Computational Thinking to Future Teachers. Andean Journal of Education, 9(1), 5579. https://doi.org/10.32719/26312816.5579

References

Adell, J., Llopis, M., Esteve, F., & Valdeolivas, M. (2019). El debate sobre el pensamiento computacional en educación. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 22(1), 171-186. https://tinyurl.com/bde6r57s

Arjona, G., Moral, S., Sánchez, C., & Ruano, A. (2025). Diseño y mejora de actividades de iniciación al pensamiento computacional en el aula de matemáticas. Aula, 31. https://doi.org/10.14201/aula2025.32202

Arrifano, P., & Brigas, C. (2022). El pensamiento computacional en educación infantil: Un análisis a través del Computer Science Unplugged. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación Del Profesorado, 98(36.2). https://doi.org/10.47553/rifop.v98i36.2.94881

Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12. ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48-54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905

Barradas, R., Lencastre, J., Soares, S., & Valente, A. (2020). Developing Computational Thinking in Early Ages: A Review of the Code.org Platform. En H. C. Lane, S. Zvacek y J. Uhomoibhi, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Education. Volume 2 (pp. 157-168). CSEDU. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009576801570168

Barragán, E. (2023). Pensamiento computacional y programación en la formación de alumnos desde edades tempranas. Revista Educación, 47(2). https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v47i2.53645

Bell, A., Hankison, S., & Laskowski, K. (2009). The Repeatability of Behaviour: A Meta-Analysis. Animal Behaviour, 77(4), 771-783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.12.022

Bell, T., & Vahrenhold, J. (2018). CS Unplugged: How Is It Used, and Does It Work? En H. Böckenhauer, D. Komm y W. Unger, Adventures Between Lower Bounds and Higher Altitudes: Essays Dedicated to Juraj Hromkovic on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday (pp. 497-521). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98355-4_29

Bravo, W., Castiblanco, R., & Pascuas, Y. (2024). Perspectiva crítica para la enseñanza del pensamiento computacional. Revista Politécnica, 20(39), 196-207. https://doi.org/10.33571/rpolitec.v20n39a14

Caballero, Y., & García-Valcárcel, A. (2021). Robots en la educación de la primera infancia: Aprender a secuenciar acciones usando robots programables. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(1), 77-94. https://tinyurl.com/2tzkb9kw

Cabra, M., & Ramírez, S. (2021). Desarrollo del pensamiento computacional y las competencias matemáticas en análisis y solución de problemas: Una experiencia de aprendizaje con Scratch en la plataforma Moodle. Revista Educación, 46(1), 171-187. https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v46i1.44970

Cabrera, J., Sánchez, I., & Medina, F. (2020). El ingeniero de inclusión y el lenguaje Scratch en el aprendizaje de la matemática. Información Tecnológica, 31(6), 117-124. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-07642020000600117

Caicedo, J., Arévalo, J., Piccioni, F., Bray, M., Hartland, C., Wu, X., Brooks, A., Berger, A., Boehm, J., Carpenter, A., & Singh, S. (2022). Cell Painting Predicts Impact of Lung Cancer Variants. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 33(6). https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e21-11-0538

Chen, J., & Hui. J. (2024). Put Two and Two Together: A Systematic Review of Combining Computational Thinking and Project-Based Learning in STEM Classrooms. STEM Education Review, 2. https://doi.org/10.54844/stemer.2023.0470

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

Computer Science Teachers Association (2011).

Corrales, M., Ocampo, L., & Cardona, S. (2024a). Definiciones del pensamiento computacional: Una revisión de la literatura. Revista EIA, 21(42). https://doi.org/10.24050/reia.v21i42.1716

Corrales, M., Ocampo, L., & Cardona, S. (2024b). Instrumentos de evaluación del pensamiento computacional: una revisión sistemática. Tecnológicas, 27(59). https://doi.org/10.22430/22565337.2950

Cossío, P. (2021). Pensamiento computacional: Habilidades asociadas y recursos didácticos. Una revisión sistemática. Revista Innovaciones Educativas, 23, 178-189. https://doi.org/10.22458/ie.v23iespecial.3693

Delal, H., & Oner, D. (2020). Developing Middle School Students' Computational Thinking Skills Using Unplugged Computing Activities. Informatics in Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2020.01

Figueroa, I., Guerra, P., & Madrid, A. (2022). Construcción de la identidad docente de las educadoras de párvulos: Significados retrospectivos de su formación inicial docente. Perspectiva Educacional, 61(2), 45-67. https://dx.doi.org/10.4151/07189729-vol.61-iss.2-art.1225

Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2018). Computational Thinking: A Competency Whose Time Has Come. En S. Sentance, E. Barendsen y C. Schulte (eds.), Computer Science Education: Perspectives on Teaching and Learning in School (pp. 19-38). Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350057142.ch-003

Hernández Sampieri, R. & Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.22201/fesc.20072236e.2019.10.18.6

Iglesias, A., & Bordignon, F. (2021). Taxonomía de actividades desconectadas para el desarrollo de pensamiento computacional. Virtualidad, Educación y Ciencia, 12(22), 119-135. https://tinyurl.com/5rectyyr

Jaramillo, E., Vera, T., Alarcón, N., Quiñónez, D., & Arteaga, J. (2023). Estrategias efectivas para fomentar el pensamiento crítico en el aula. Ciencia Latina. Revista Multidisciplinar, 7(2), 6147-6162. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i2.5780

López Simó, V., Couso, D., & Simarro, C. (2020). Educación STEM en y para el mundo digital: El papel de las herramientas digitales en el desempeño de prácticas científicas, ingenieriles y matemáticas. RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 20(62). https://doi.org/10.6018/red.410011

Mantilla, R., & Negre, F. (2021). Pensamiento computacional: Una estrategia educativa en épocas de pandemia. Innoeduca. International Journal of Technology and Educational Innovation, 7(1), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.24310/innoeduca.2021.v7i1.10593

Marwa, M., Saputra, W., & Herlinawati, H. (2024). International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) Standards for EFL Student as 21st Century Skills. ELT-Lectura, 11(1). https://tinyurl.com/bdda36eu

MINEDUC (2021). Bases curriculares 3. y 4. medio. MINEDUC. https://tinyurl.com/bdef9r35

Mono, A. (2023). Pensamiento computacional para una sociedad 5.0. Tecnología, Ciencia y Educación, 25, 111-140. https://doi.org/10.51302/tce.2023.1440

Ñaupas, H., Mejía, E., Novoa, E., & Villagómez, A. (2019). Metodología de la investigación cuantitativa-cualitativa y redacción de la tesis. Ediciones de la U. https://tinyurl.com/5hdu5wx9

OCDE (2018). PISA 2012 Results: Creative Problem Solving (Volume V): Students' Skills in Tackling Real-Life Problems. OCDE. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264208070-en

Ortega, B (2018). Robótica DIY: Pensamiento computacional para mejorar la resolución de problemas. RELATEC. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 17(2), 129-143. https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.17.2.129

Ortega, B. (2020). Pedagogía del pensamiento computacional desde la psicología: Un pensamiento para resolver problemas. Cuestiones Pedagógicas, 2(29), 130-144. https://doi.org/10.12795/cp.2020.i29.v2.10

Piazza, A., & Mengual, S. (2020). Computational Thinking and Coding in Primary Education: Scientific Productivity on SCOPUS. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 59, 147-182. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.79769

Quevedo, E., & Zapatera, A. (2021). Assessment of Scratch Programming Language as a Didactic Tool to Teach Functions. Education Sciences, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090499

Quiroga, I., Ruales, C., Bernal, E., Acosta, A., Guzmán, E., Ordóñez, J., Gómez, L., Pinzón, S., Torres, M., Soto, M., Pitta, M., García, H., & Rubio, A. (2022). Innovación, TIC y gamificación: Aportes desde el saber pedagógico para la educación del siglo XXI. Alcaldía Mayor de Bogotá / Instituto para la Investigación Educativa y el Desarrollo Pedagógico. https://tinyurl.com/4ad7zp9p

Quiroz, D., Carmona, J., Castrillón, A., & Villa, J. (2021). Integración del pensamiento computacional en la educación primaria y secundaria en Latinoamérica: Una revisión sistemática de literatura. RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 21(68). https://doi.org/10.6018/red.485321

Rondón, G. (2020). Propuesta para desarrollar habilidades de pensamiento computaciones en estudiantes de décimo grado del Colegio Facundo Navas Mantilla [tesis de maestría]. Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga, Colombia. https://tinyurl.com/2vmvbvww

Sánchez, M. (2021). La robótica, la programación y el pensamiento computacional en la educación infantil. IEYA Revista, 7(1), 209-234. https://tinyurl.com/2h86tdx2

Scratch (2025). Acerca de Scratch. Scratch. Accedido 14 de octubre. https://tinyurl.com/9bxn5fzf

Tucker, A., Seehorn, D., Moix, D., Fuschetto, B., Lee, I., O’Grady-Cuniff, D., & Verno, A. (2011). CSTA K-12 Computer Science Standards. Computer Science Teachers Association / The Association for Computing Machinery. https://tinyurl.com/ya9nenkz

Vílchez, J., & Ramón, J. (2024). Influencia del pensamiento computacional y visual en el aprendizaje de la matemática en estudiantes universitarios. Información Tecnológica, 35(4), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-07642024000400013

Wing, J. (2008). Computational Thinking and Thinking about Computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717-3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118

Yadav, A., Gretter, S., Good, J., & McLean, T. (2017). Computational Thinking in Teacher Education. En P. Rich y C. Hodges (eds.), Emerging Research, Practice, and Policy on Computational Thinking (pp. 205-220). Association for Educational Communications & Technology / Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1_13