Navegando la nueva normalidad: percepción del profesorado sobre confianza y riesgos en la adopción de inteligencia artificial generativa en educación superior
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
La inteligencia artificial generativa (IA generativa), ejemplificada por herramientas como ChatGPT, es cada vez más popular en el ámbito académico debido a su potencial para asistir a los educadores en tareas como la planificación de clases, la tutoría personalizada y la calificación automatizada. Sin embargo, también presenta desafíos, como el riesgo de información inexacta o sesgada, el plagio y efectos negativos en el desarrollo cognitivo. Este estudio tiene como objetivo explorar los factores que influyen en la adopción de IA generativa en el contexto de educación superior. Un estudio con 550 profesores encontró que la confianza en el contenido de IA generativa influye positivamente en su adopción. La investigación, basada en el modelo UTAUT, reveló que mayor confianza en IA generativa se asocia con una perspectiva más positiva sobre su desempeño y facilidad de uso, así como con una mayor intención de adoptar la tecnología. Además, el estudio encontró que la confianza reduce los riesgos percibidos de usar IA generativa, lo que a su vez fomenta la adopción.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.downloads##
Detalles del artículo
Sección
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Los/as autores/as que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
1. Los/as autores/as conservan los derechos de autoría y ceden a la Revista Andina de Educación el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo registrado con la licencia de atribución para uso no comercial de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
2. Los/as autores/as pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en la Revista Andina de Educación.
Cómo citar
Referencias
Al-Abdullatif, A. (2024). Modeling Teachers’ Acceptance of Generative Artificial Intelligence Use in Higher Education: The Role of AI Literacy, Intelligent TPACK, and Perceived Trust. Education Sciences, 14(11), 1209. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111209
Ali, F., Yasar, B., Ali, L., & Dogan, S. (2023). Antecedents and Consequences of Travelers’ Trust towards Personalized Travel Recommendations Offered by ChatGPT. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103588
Alwaqdani, M. (2024). Investigating Teachers’ Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Education: Potential and Difficulties. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 2737-2755. https://tinyurl.com/4khths77
Amado, H., Morales, M., Hernandez, R., & Rosales, M. (2024). Exploring Educators’ Perceptions: Artificial Intelligence Integration in Higher Education. Paper presented in the 2024 IEEE World Engineering Education Conference (EDUNINE), Guatemala City, March 10-13. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUNINE60625.2024.10500578
Arif, I., Aslam, W., & Ali, M. (2016). Students’ Dependence on Smartphones and Its Effect on Purchasing Behavior. South Asian Journal of Global Business Research, 5(2), 285-302. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJGBR-05-2014-0031
Ayoub, D., Metawie, M., & Fakhry, M. (2024). AI-ChatGPT Usage Among Users: Factors Affecting Intentions to Use and the Moderating Effect of Privacy Concerns. MSA-Management Sciences Journal, 3(2), 120-152. https://doi.org/10.21608/msamsj.2024.265212.1054
Bæk, D. (2025). Deepseek Users & Downloads. SEO.Ai. January 28. https://tinyurl.com/mrbu5fwt
Baek, T. H., & Kim, M. (2023). Is ChatGPT Scary Good? How User Motivations Affect Creepiness and Trust in Generative Artificial Intelligence. Telematics and Informatics, 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.102030
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4337484
Banihashem, S., Kerman, N., Noroozi, O., Moon, J., & Drachsler, H. (2024). Feedback Sources in Essay Writing: Peer-Generated or AI-Generated Feedback? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://tinyurl.com/3d6jjyup
Bentler, P., & Bonett, D. (1980). Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
Bhaskar, P., Misra, P., & Chopra, G. (2024). Shall I Use ChatGPT? A Study on Perceived Trust and Perceived Risk towards ChatGPT Usage by Teachers at Higher Education Institutions. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 41(4), 428-447. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-11-2023-0220
Brata, A., & Amalia, F. (2018). Impact Analysis of Social Influence Factor on Using Free Blogs as Learning Media for Driving Teaching Motivational Factor. Paper presented in the ICFET ’18: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Frontiers of Educational Technologies, Moscow, June 25-27. https://doi.org/10.11 45/3233347.3233360
Camilleri, M. (2024). Factors Affecting Performance Expectancy and Intentions to Use ChatGPT: Using SmartPLS to Advance an Information Technology Acceptance Framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123247
Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., & Järvelä, S. (2022). The Promises and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence for Teachers: A Systematic Review of Research. TechTrends, 66(4), 616-630. https://tinyurl.com/5dwtp5ea
Chan, C., & Tsi, L. (2024). Will Generative AI Replace Teachers in Higher Education? A Study of Teacher and Student Perceptions. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101395
Choi, S., Jang, Y., & Kim, H. (2023). Influence of Pedagogical Beliefs and Perceived Trust on Teachers’ Acceptance of Educational Artificial Intelligence Tools. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(4), 910-922. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2049145
Cviko, A., McKenney, S., & Voogt, J. (2012). Teachers Enacting a Technology-Rich Curriculum for Emergent Literacy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 31-54. https://tinyurl.com/ycyt8tv2
Dwivedi, Y., Rana, N., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. (2019). Re-Examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model. Information Systems Frontiers, 21, 719-734. https://tinyurl.com/yhcxdfzj
Dwivedi, Y., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A., Baabdullah, A., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M., Al-Busaidi. A., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., Carter, L., Chowdury, S., Crick, T., Cunningham, S., Davies, G., Davison, R., Dé, R., Dennehy, D., Duan, Y., Dubey, R., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Flavián, C., Gauld, R., Grover, V., Hu, M., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Junglas, I., Khorana, S., Kraus, S., Larsen, K., Latreille, P., Laumer, S., Malik, F., Mardani, A., Mariani, M., Mithas, S., Magaji, E., Nord, J., O’Connor, S., Okumus, F., Pagani, M., Pandey, N., Papagiannidis, S., Pappas, I., Pathak, N., Pries-Heje, J., Raman, R., Rana, N., Rehm, S., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Richter, A., Rowe, F., Sarker, S., Stahl, B., Tiwari, M., Van der Aalst, W., Venkatesh, V., Viglia, G., Wade, M., Walton, P., Wirtz, J., & Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So What if ChatGPT Wrote It?”: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Opportunities, Challenges and Implications of Generative Conversational AI for Research, Practice and Policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Friedrich, T., Schlauderer, S., & Overhage, S. (2021). Some Things Are Just Better Rich: How Social Commerce Feature Richness Affects Consumers’ Buying Intention Via Social Factors. Electronic Markets, 31, 159-180. https://tinyurl.com/4f748a3e
Gentile, M., Città, G., Perna, S., & Allegra, M. (2023, March). Do We Still Need Teachers? Navigating the Paradigm Shift of the Teacher’s Role in the AI Era. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1161777
Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the Future of Education: Exploring the Potential and Consequences of AI and ChatGPT in Educational Settings. Education Sciences, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692
Hair, J., Risher, J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. (2019). When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D., Ketchen, D., Hair, J., Hult, G., & Calantone, R. (2014). Common Beliefs and Reality about PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organizational research methods, 17(2), 182-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114526928
Henseler, J., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135. https://tinyurl.com/2s45j7t7
Hockly, N. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in English Language Teaching: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. RELC Journal, 54(2), 445-451. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 00336882231168504
Hu, K. (2023). ChatGPT Sets Record for Fastest-Growing User Base: Analyst Note. Reuters. February 2. https://tinyurl.com/4jpfe23e
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Im, I., Hong, S., & Kang, M. (2011). An International Comparison of Technology Adoption: Testing the UTAUT Model. Information & Management, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.09.001
Ivanov, S., & Soliman, M. (2023). Game of Algorithms: ChatGPT Implications for the Future of Tourism Education and Research. Journal of Tourism Futures, 9(2), 214-221. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-02-2023-0038
Ivanov, S., Soliman, M., Tuomi, A., Alkathiri, N., & Al-Alawi, A. (2024). Drivers of Generative AI Adoption in Higher Education through the Lens of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Technology in Society, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102521
Kalpokiene, J., & Kalpokas, I. (2023). Creative Encounters of a Posthuman Kind: Anthropocentric Law, Artificial Intelligence, and Art. Technology in Society, 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102197
Khan, M., Al Raja, M., & Al-Shanfari, S. (2019). The Effect of Effort Expectancy, Ubiquity, and Context on Intention to Use Online Applications. Paper presented in the 2019 International Conference on Digitization (ICD), Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, November 18-19.
Khlaif, Z., Ayyoub, A., Hamamra, B., Bensalem, E., Mitwally, M. A., Ayyoub, A., Hattab, M., & Shadid, F. (2024). University Teachers’ Views on the Adoption and Integration of Generative AI Tools for Student Assessment in Higher Education. Education Sciences, 14(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101090
Kline, R. (2023). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford. https://tinyurl.com/4ssfarkm
McLeod, A., Pippin, S., & Mason, R. (2008). Individual Taxpayer Intention to Use Tax Preparation Software: Examining Experience, Trust, and Perceived Risk. Journal of Information Science and Technology, 2(4). https://tinyurl.com/nws5mzrp
Menon, D., & Shilpa, K. (2023). “Chatting with ChatGPT”: Analyzing the Factors Influencing Users’ Intention to Use the Open AI’s ChatGPT using the UTAUT Model. Heliyon, 9(11). https://tinyurl.com/5b6azst9
Mishra, P., Warr, M., & Islam, R. (2023). TPACK in the Age of ChatGPT and Generative AI. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 39(4), 235-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2023.2247480
Mohammed, A., White, G., Wang, X., & Kai Chan, H. (2018). IT Adoption in Social Care: A Study of the Factors that Mediate Technology Adoption. Strategic Change, 27(3), 267-279. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2200
Naujoks, T., Schulte, B., & Hattula, C. (2024). Exploring Perceptions and Usage of Generative Artificial Intelligence: An Empirical Study among Management Studies. In F. Tigre (ed.), Artificial Intelligence, Co-Creation and Creativity: The New Frontier for Innovation (pp. 178-94). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003453901
Ng, K., Drenon, B., Gerken, T., & Cieslak, M. (2025). DeepSeek: The Chinese AI App that Has the World Talking. BBC News. February 4. https://tinyurl.com/3ktwxjzd
Nikitina, I., & Ishchenko, T. (2024). The Impact of AI on Teachers: Support or “Replacement? Scientific Journal of Polonia University, 65(4), 93-99. https://tinyurl.com/35maw8hk
Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill. https://tinyurl.com/26pe6npb
OpenAI (2023)
Patil, P., Tamilmani, K., Rana, N., & Raghavan, V. (2020). Understanding Consumer Adoption of Mobile Payment in India: Extending Meta-UTAUT Model with Personal Innovativeness, Anxiety, Trust, and Grievance Redressal. International Journal of Information Management, 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102144
Pavlou, P. (2003). Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275
Peres, R., Schreier, M., Schweidel, D., & Sorescu, A. (2023). On ChatGPT and Beyond: How Generative Artificial Intelligence May Affect Research, Teaching, and Practice. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 40(2), 269-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2023.03.001
Plata, S., De Guzmán, M., & Quesada, A. (2023). Emerging Research and Policy Themes on Academic Integrity in the Age of ChatGPT and Generative AI. Asian Journal of University Education, 19(4), 743-758. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v19i4.24697
Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Proctor, M., & Marks, Y. (2013). A Survey of Exemplar Teachers’ Perceptions, Use, and Access of Computer-Based Games and Technology for Classroom Instruction. Computers & Education, 62, 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.022
Rahman, M., Ming, T., Baigh, T., & Sarker, M. (2023). Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Banking Services: An Empirical Analysis. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(10), 4270-4300. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-06-2020-0724
Rice, S., Crouse, S., Winter, S., & Rice, C. (2024). The Advantages and Limitations of Using ChatGPT to Enhance Technological Research. Technology in Society, 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102426
Schaupp, L., Carter, L., & McBride, M. (2010). E-File Adoption: A Study of US Taxpayers’ Intentions. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 636-644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.12.017
Shahzad, M., Xu, S., & Javed, I. (2024). ChatGPT Awareness, Acceptance, and Adoption in Higher Education: The Role of Trust as a Cornerstone. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://tinyurl.com/bdz3kxn2
Teo, T. (2009). Modelling Technology Acceptance in Education: A Study of Pre-Service Teachers. Computers & Education, 52(2), 302-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006
Teo, T., & Milutinovic, V. (2015). Modelling the Intention to Use Technology for Teaching Mathematics among Pre-Service Teachers in Serbia. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1668
Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2014). Explaining the Intention to Use Technology among University Students: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26, 124-142. https://tinyurl.com/55kh8evb
Thiesse, F. (2007). RFID, Privacy and the Perception of Risk: A Strategic Framework. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16(2), 214-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.05.006
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Watermeyer, R., Phipps, L., Lanclos, D., & Knight, C. (2024). Generative AI and the Automating of Academia. Postdigital Science and Education, 6(2), 446-466. https://tinyurl.com/yvsdm5zf
Wong, K., Teo, T., & Russo, S. (2013). Interactive Whiteboard Acceptance: Applicability of the UTAUT Model to Student Teachers. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22. https://tinyurl.com/ydj6b6jd
Wu, W., Zhang, B., Li, S., & Liu, H. (2022). Exploring Factors of the Willingness to Accept AI-Assisted Learning Environments: An Empirical Investigation Based on the UTAUT Model and Perceived Risk Theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.870777
Yu, C. S. (2012). Factors Affecting Individuals to Adopt Mobile Banking: Empirical Evidence from the UTAUT Model. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 13(2), 104-121. https://tinyurl.com/mwuw6v3k
Zhang, T., Tao, D., Qu, X., Zhang, X., Lin, R., & Zhang, W. (2019). The Roles of Initial Trust and Perceived Risk in Public’s Acceptance of Automated Vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 98, 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.018
Zhou, T., Lu, Y., & Wang, B. (2010). Integrating TTF and UTAUT to Explain Mobile Banking User Adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 760-767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.013