Governança corporativa e diálogo social: rumo a uma sustentabilidade empresarial com enfoque social
Barra lateral de artigos
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
Este artigo analisa criticamente a incorporação do diálogo social nas políticas empresariais como eixo central da sustentabilidade social e da governança corporativa contemporânea. A partir de uma abordagem analítica e comparativa, o estudo examina como diferentes empresas, em contextos europeus, norte-americanos, asiáticos e latino-americanos, institucionalizaram mecanismos de participação social que transcendem enfoques instrumentais de responsabilidade social empresarial. O trabalho articula desenvolvimentos teóricos sobre governança corporativa ampliada, participação de stakeholders
e sustentabilidade social com a análise de práticas empíricas verificáveis, conferindo
especial atenção aos arranjos organizacionais, aos espaços de deliberação multissetorial e ao seu impacto na tomada de decisões estratégicas. Os resultados indicam que a sustentabilidade social depende menos da existência formal de mecanismos participativos e mais de sua capacidade de incidir sobre normas internas, estruturas de governança e processos decisórios. O artigo conclui propondo uma abordagem de governança corporativa com orientação social, particularmente relevante para economias emergentes, nas quais o diálogo social pode contribuir para fortalecer a legitimidade empresarial e a articulação com a sociedade civil em contextos de elevada complexidade institucional.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.downloads##
Detalhes do artigo
Seção
Como Citar
Referências
Aguilera, Ruth, Igor Filatotchev, Howard Gospel y Gregory Jackson. 2008. “An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities”. Organization Science, 19 (3): 475-92. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0322.
Aguilera, Ruth, Valentina Marano e Ilir Haxhi. 2019. “International corporate governance: A review and opportunities for future research”. Journal of International Business Studies 50 (4): 457-98. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00232-w.
Ansell, Cris, y Alison Gash. 2008. “Collaborative governance in theory and practice”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 543-71. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032.
Austin, Robert, y Gary Pisano. 2017. “Neurodiversity as a competitive advantage”. Harvard Business Review 95 (3): 96-103. https://hbr.org/2017/05/neurodiversity-as-a-competitiveadvantage.
Banco Europeo de Inversiones. 2021. Sustainability Report. Luxemburgo: European Investment Bank. https://www.eib.org/files/publications/sustainability_report_2021_en.pdf.
Boström, Magnus. 2012. “A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability”. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 8 (1): 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2012.11908080.
Bowen, Glenn. 2009. “Document analysis as a qualitative research method”. Qualitative Research Journal 9 (2): 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027.
Brest, Paul, y Kelly Born. 2013. “Unpacking the impact in impact investing”. Stanford Social Innovation Review 11 (4): 22-31. https://doi.org/10.48558/7X1Y-MF25.
Cemex. 2023. Reporte integrado Cemex. México: Cemex Informes de sostenibilidad. https:// www.cemexpuertorico.com/documents/2563957/7880046/reporte-integrado-2023.pdf/b447b02a-90db-40c2-278c-2903569c17d8?version=1.0&t=1766274997477.
Crane, Andrew, Dirk Matten, Sarah Glozer y Laura Spence. 2019. Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. 5.ª ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crane, Andrew. 2019. Business and society: Stakeholders, ethics, public policy. 5.ª ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dembek, Krzysztof, Praklash Singh y Vikram Bhakoo. 2016. “Literature review of shared value: A theoretical concept or a management buzzword?”. Journal of Business Ethics 137 (2): 231-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2554-z.
Dempsey, Nicola, Glen Bramley, Sinead Power y Caroline Brown. 2011. “The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability”. Sustainable Development 19 (5): 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.417.
Denzin, Norman, e Yvonna Lincoln. 2018. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. (5.ª ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Donaldson, Thomas, y Lee Preston. 1995. “The stakeholder theory of the corporation”. Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 65-91. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992.
Elkington, John. 2018. “25 years ago I coined the phrase “Triple Bottom Line”. Here’s why it’s time to rethink it”. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2018/06/25-years-ago-icoined-the-phrase-triple-bottom-line-heres-why-im-giving-up-on-it.
Ferri, Laura, Matteo Pedrini y Marco Minciullo. 2022. “Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder dialogue under institutional voids: Decoupling the role of corporate motives, ethics, and resources”. Journal of Management and Governance 26 (1): 159-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-021-09598-2.
Floridi, Luciano. 2018. Soft ethics and the governance of artificial intelligence. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute.
Freeman, Robert. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
García Salazar, Ángela, Alejandro Echeverri Rubio y Jaime Vieira Salazar. 2021. “Responsabilidad social corporativa y gobernanza: una revisión”. Revista Universidad & Empresa, 23 (40): 1-26. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/empresa/a.9389.
Iluméxico. 2024. Informe de impacto social y energético. Iluméxico A.C.
International Energy Agency (IEA). 2021. Africa energy outlook 2021. IEA.
International Labour Organization (ILO). 2013. Social Dialogue. Recurrent discussion under the ILO Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization. Geneva: International Labour Office. https://www.ilo.org/media/170351/download.
ISO. 2010. “ISO 26000: Guidance on social responsibility”. International Organization for Standardization. Accedido febrero 2026. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui#iso:std:iso:26000:ed-1:v1:es.
Krippendorff, Klaus. 2019. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. 4.ª ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Merco Responsabilidad ESG México. 2024. Ranking Merco ESG México 2024. Merco. https://www.merco.info/files/2025/02/2185/nota-de-prensa-esg-mexico-2024.pdf.
Musa, Maizatul Akmal, y Shahril Eashak Ismail. 2025. “Stakeholder participation and social responsibility: A dynamic framework for corporate governance”. Information Management and Business Review 17 (3): 68-85. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v17i3(I)S.4745.
Nicholls, Alex. 2012. “The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: Reflexive isomorphism in a pre paradigmatic field”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 34 (4): 611-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00397.x.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2023. “OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct”. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/06/oecd-guidelines-for-multinational-enterprises-on-responsible-business-conduct_a0b49990/81f92357-en.pdf.
Owen, John, y Deanna Kemp. 2013. “Social licence and mining: A critical perspective”. Resources Policy 38 (1): 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.06.016.
Patagonia. 2023. Environmental & social responsibility report. Patagonia Works.
Porter, Michael, y Mark Kramer. 2011. “Creating shared value”. Harvard Business Review 89 (1-2): 62-77. https://www.communitylivingbc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Creating-Shared-Value.pdf.
Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (PNUD). 2022. Energy access and human development in Sub-Saharan Africa. UNDP.
Scherer, Andreas, Andreas Rasche, Guido Palazzo y Andre Spicer. 2016. “Managing for political corporate social responsibility”. Journal of Management Studies 53 (3): 273-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12199.
Scherer, Andreas, y Guido Palazzo. 2011. “The new political role of business in a globalized world”. Journal of Management Studies 48 (4): 899-931. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00950.x.
Schouten, Greetje, y Pieter Glasbergen. 2011. “Creating legitimacy in global private governance: The case of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil”. Ecological Economics 70 (11): 1891-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.012.
Schwab, Klaus, y Peter Vanham. 2021. Stakeholder capitalism: A global economy that works for progress, people and planet. Oregon: Ascent Audio and Blackstone Publishing.
Serafeim, George. 2022. Purpose and profit: How business can lift up the world. Nueva York: Harper Business.
Siemens. 2022. Sustainability report: Empowering people through technology. Siemens AG.
Silverman, David. 2020. Doing qualitative data analysis. 2.ª ed. Londres: Sage Publications.
Stake, Robert. 2006. Multiple case study analysis. Nueva York: Guilford Press. https://staibabussalamsula.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Robert-E.-Stake-Multiple-Case-Study-
Analysis-2005-The-Guilford-Press-staibabussalamsula.ac_.id_.pdf.
Suchman, Mark. 1995. “Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches”. Academy of Management Review 20 (3), 571-610. https://www.jstor.org/stable/258788.
Tata Group. 2022. ESG Report. Tata Sons. https://www.tataconsumer.com/sites/g/files/gfwrlq316/files/2022-07/tcpl-ESG-report-2022.pdf.
Unilever. 2021. Unilever sustainable living plan: Progress report. Unilever PLC.
Visser, Wayne. 2011. The age of responsibility: CSR 2.0 and the new DNA of business. Chinghester: John Wiley & Sons Limited.
World Economic Forum (WEF). 2020. “Measuring stakeholder capitalism: Towards common metrics and consistent reporting of sustainable value creation”. WEF. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_IBC_Measuring_Stakeholder_Capitalism_Report_2020.pdf.
Wu, Lijuan, y Shanyue Jin. 2022. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability: From a Corporate Governance Perspective”. Sustainability 14 (22), 15457. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215457.