Cartographies of the Cyborgcrip and the Geopolitics of the Empire of the Gaze in Latin America

Main Article Content

Wilmer Miranda Carvajal

Abstract

This article analyzes how blind people—in Ecuador, Mexico, and Chile—reconfigure our autonomy in relation to the “empire of the gaze” through practices of existence and re-existence mediated by technology. The methodology relies on a dialogical autoethnography that prioritizes situated knowledge and narrative resonance among participants who take part in a focus group via the Zoom platform. The findings highlight the emergence of the cyborg crip and access-making as forms of situated expertise within an ecosystem of asymmetric innovation, as well as the persistence of design exclusions that force the “translation” of visual interfaces at the cost of time and energy unrecognized by hegemonic visual norms. At the same time, the study underscores technology-mediated community networks as support for assisted autonomy. The article concludes with a proposal for governance grounded in the principle of universal accessibility that co-designs with users, accounts for non-normative temporalities, and, from a decolonial perspective, fosters interdependencies that enable more just collective lives for all.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Of the contemporary scene

How to Cite

Miranda Carvajal, Wilmer. 2026. “Cartographies of the Cyborgcrip and the Geopolitics of the Empire of the Gaze in Latin America”. Kipus: Revista Andina De Letras Y Estudios Culturales, no. 59 (January): 177-94. https://doi.org/10.32719/13900102.2026.59.9.

References

Benjamin, Ruha. 2019. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Polity Press. https://www.politybooks.com/bookdetail?book_slug=race-after-technology--9781509526406.

Escobar, Arturo. 2020. El lugar de la naturaleza o la naturaleza del lugar: globalización o post desarrollo. Caracas: Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales / Instituto Internacional de la UNESCO.

Flick, Uwe. 2013. Introducción a la investigación cualitativa. Madrid: Ediciones Morata. https://edmorata.es/producto/introduccion-a-la-investigacion-cualitativa/.

Garcés, Marina. 2017. Nueva ilustración radical. Barcelona: Anagrama. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=836122.

Hamraie, Aimi, y Kally K. Fritsch. 2019. “Crip technoscience manifesto”. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 5 (1): 1-34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332145090_Crip_Technoscience_Manifesto#fullTextFileContent. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v5i1.29607

Hendren, Sara. 2020. What Can a Body Do? How We Meet the Built World. Nueva York: Riverhead Books.

Kafer, Alison. 2013. “The Cyborg and the Crip: Critical encounters”. En Feminist, Queer, Crip. Indiana University Press. https://s3.amazonaws.com/arena-attachments/1334199/174e62bd60070c3ee4f22262f1d6c0d4.pdf?1507839408.

Kafer, Alison. 2013. Feminist, Queer, Crip. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. https://iupress.org/9780253009340/feminist-queer-crip/. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/6841.0

La Hora. 2002. “Inauguraron Biblioteca Nacional del Invidente”. La Hora (Quito), 15 de mayo. https://www.lahora.com.ec/archivo/Inauguraron-Biblioteca-Nacional-del-Invidente-20020515-0108.html.

Latour, Bruno. 2008. Reensamblar lo social: una introducción a la teoría del actor-red. Traducido por Gabriel Zadunaisky. Buenos Aires: Manantial. https://seminariosocioantropologia.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/orca_share_media1470719009830-1.pdf.

Martínez Castillo, Yilberth A., Karen G. Naranjo Cotacio, Jaime A. Torres Ortiz y Claudia P. Castro Medina. 2022. “Capítulo 2. La tiflotecnología”. En La tiflotecnología, una herramienta para la construcción de identidad en el contexto sociocultural de personas con discapacidad visual. Tunja: Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia. https://doi.org/10.19053/9789586606332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19053/9789586606332

Noble, Safiya. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. Nueva York: NYU Press. https://nyupress.org/9781479837243/algorithms-of-oppression/.

Samuels, Ellen, y Elizabeth Freeman. 2021. “Introduction: crip temporalities”. South Atlantic Quarterly 120 (2): 245-54. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-8915937. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-8915937

Skliar, Carlos. 2012. “Acerca de la alteridad, la normalidad, la anormalidad, la diferencia, la diversidad, la discapacidad y la pronunciación de lo educativo”. En Debates y perspectivas en torno a la discapacidad en América Latina, compilado por María E. Almeida y María A. Angelino, 180-94. Paraná: Universidad de Entre Ríos. https://libros.unlp.edu.ar/index.php/unlp/catalog/download/297/6006/10530-1.

Titchkosky, Tania A. 2011. The Question of Access: Disability, Space, Meaning. Toronto / Buffalo / Londres: Universidad de Toronto Press. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/TanyaTitchkosky/publication/303419533_The_Question_of_Access_Disability_Space_Meaning/links/5b9a694245851574f7c3d216/The-Question-of-Access-Disability-Space-Meaning.pdf.

Verbeek, Peter P. 2005. What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. Pensilvania: Pennsylvania State University Press. https://dokumen.pub/what-things-do-philosophical-reflections-on-technology-agency-and-design-9780271033228.html. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780271033228