Arguments about Responsibility to Protect in Latin America: Diversity and Controversy about the Application of the Norm

Authors

  • Raúl Salgado Espinoza FLACSO Ecuador.
  • Tatiana Álvarez FLACSO Ecuador.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32719/26312549.2017.17.2

Keywords:

R2P; constructivism; South America; Brazil; Ecuador; UN; conflicts resolution.

Abstract

This paper analyzes how the international norm of Responsibility to Protect (R2P) is conceived in the south of the American continent, paying special attention to the position of Ecuador and Brazil, and explains the different South American perspectives about its application in the cases of Syria and Libya. This article takes into consideration the constructivist theory to deepen in evidences of discursive character understand and explain how a posture about a liberal norm is built from South. According to constructivism a qualitative methodology was used, studying academic literature about the subject, analyzing official speeches from Ministers and Presidents of the study cases and interpreting journalistic notes and official documents from Brazil and Ecuador.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Raúl Salgado Espinoza, FLACSO Ecuador.

PhD en Ciencia Política y Estudios Internacionales, Universidad de Birmingham, Reino Unido. Profesor Asociado, Departamento de Estudios Internacionales y Comunicación, FLACSO Ecuador.

Tatiana Álvarez, FLACSO Ecuador.

Máster en Relaciones Internacionales, mención en Seguridad y Derechos Humanos, FLACSO Ecuador.

Published

2018-12-24

How to Cite

Salgado Espinoza, R., & Álvarez, T. (2018). Arguments about Responsibility to Protect in Latin America: Diversity and Controversy about the Application of the Norm. Comentario Internacional. Journal of the Andean Center of International Studies, (17), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.32719/26312549.2017.17.2
Métricas alternativas