From Panama to San Andres: Mutations in Colombian Foreign Policy

Authors

  • Fabio Sánchez Universidad Sergio Arboleda
  • Santiago Mejía Universidad Sergio Arboleda

Keywords:

Colombia, foreign policy, neoclassical realism, mutation

Abstract

Colombian foreign policy has gone through important transformations in its formulation and implementation. Through a Neoclassical Realist (NCR) analysis, this article discusses the domestic and systemic factors that have influenced the Foreign Policy Executive (FPE) in Colombia. It makes a historical journey through different presidential terms, ranging from the loss of Panama in 1903, to the adverse decision of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in 2012, which stripped Bogotá of a significant portion of its Caribbean Sea. This analysis reveals problems in the formulation of Colombian foreign policy due to a weak foreign service, a complex relationship with the United States and the country’s internal conflict; it is argued that if these factors were to be reduced or disappear, a new form of foreign policy in the country would be facilitated in the twenty-first century.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Fabio Sánchez, Universidad Sergio Arboleda

Profesor Escuela de Política y Relaciones Internacionales, Grupo de Análisis Político (GAP), Universidad Sergio Arboleda, Bogotá.

Santiago Mejía, Universidad Sergio Arboleda

Profesional en Política y Relaciones Internacionales, estudiante de la Especialización en Gerencia Estratégica de Negocios. Universidad Sergio Arboleda, Bogotá.

Published

2014-09-15

How to Cite

Sánchez, F., & Mejía, S. (2014). From Panama to San Andres: Mutations in Colombian Foreign Policy. Comentario Internacional. Journal of the Andean Center of International Studies, (14), 31–51. Retrieved from https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/comentario/article/view/28