Good intentions and perverse effects: the limits of institutional reformism in Colombia and Venezuela
Keywords:
crises, democracy, electoral systems, institutional reform, Colombia, VenezuelaAbstract
During the 1990s, in order to manage the crisis of democracy. Venezuela and Colombia carried out institutional reforms which were aimed at improving the decentralization process, the electoral systems and the Constitution; at first sight. however, it seems that the outcomes coming from such reforms have deepened the crises. With regard to this paradoxical situation, the author argues that any reform process causes unintended and unpredictable consequences, some of which could not be always beneficial. Since there are always costs associated to institutional reform, it is necessary to avoid those kind of diagnosis which are prone to see reality as an uncontested truth.
Downloads
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
1. The authors keep the copyright and assign to the journal Comentario Internacional the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the attribution license of Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use what is published whenever they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal.
2. Authors can make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) provided they clearly indicate that the work was published for the first time in Comentario Internacional.