France-Led Security Balancing against NATO

Autores/as

  • Gökhan Tekir Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University (Ankara, Turquía)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32719/26312549.2021.21.4

Palabras clave:

PESCO, E12, Macron, NATO, Francia, seguridad, autonomía

Resumen

La tan debatida cuestión de la pertinencia de la OTAN tras el final de la Guerra Fría reaparece debido a los crecientes desacuerdos entre Estados Unidos de América (EE. UU.) y la Unión Europea (UE). La búsqueda de autonomía estratégica de los países europeos
liderados por Francia lleva a cuestionar la alianza transatlántica. Este cuestionamiento se ha hecho visible especialmente tras la elección del presidente estadounidense Donald Trump, quien expresó sus dudas sobre la relevancia de la OTAN. Mientras Estados Unidos se desentiende de las cuestiones relacionadas con la seguridad europea, los países europeos buscan vías para encontrar una política común de seguridad y defensa. El presidente francés Emmanuel Macron ha presentado varias iniciativas, como la Estructura Permanente de Cooperación (PESCO), cuyo objetivo es coordinar y profundizar la cooperación en materia de defensa entre los países miembros de la UE, y la Iniciativa Europea de Intervención (EI2), que comparte los objetivos de la PESCO, pero opera fuera del marco de la UE. Aunque estas iniciativas se denominan oficialmente “estructuras complementarias de la OTAN”, reflejan el deseo de Europa de liberarse del paraguas de seguridad estadounidense y convertirse en un organismo independiente en la política mundial. Francia, que tradicionalmente ha recelado del dominio de la seguridad estadounidense sobre Europa, está tomando la iniciativa en la estructuración de las instituciones europeas de seguridad y en la fusión de los intereses franceses con los europeos.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Referencias

Ahmedzade, Rufat. “The Battle for Libya: Growing French-Turkish Rivalry in the Mediterranean”. London School of Economics and Political Science. June 26th, 2020. https://bit.ly/3J6Mne7.

Barigazzi, Jacobo. “France Dominant in New Flurry of EU Military Projects”. Politico. November 12th, 2019. https://politi.co/3kVpHFD.

Beach, Derek. “Process-Tracing Methods in Social Science”. Oxford Research Encyclopedias: Politics. January 25th, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.176.

Bel, Olivier-Rémy. “Can Macron’s European Intervention Initiative Make the Europeans Battle-Ready?”. War on the Rocks. October 2nd, 2019. https://bit.ly/3J6nRd0.

Billon-Galland, Alice, and Martin Quencez. “Can France and Germany Make PESCO Work as a Process Toward EU Defense?”. The German Marshall Fund of the United States. Policy brief 33, 2017. https://bit.ly/3Yz9kMz.

Biscop, Sven. “Don’t Be Too Shy about PESCO”. Egmont. September 6th, 2018. https://bit.ly/3T3x76c.

—. “European Defence and PESCO: Don’t Waste the Chance”. EUIDEA. Policy paper 1, May 2020. https://bit.ly/3mDYHL9.

Blockmans, Steven, and Dylan Macchiarini Crosson. “Differentiated Integration within PESCO: Clusters and Convergence in EU Defence”. CEPS. December 2019. https://bit.ly/3J4GfD8.

Bongiovanni, Francesco. “Turkey: The NATO Alliance’s Wild Card”. Turkish Policy Quaterly 17, n.° 2 (2018): 53-62. https://bit.ly/3mMhioc.

Bowen, Andrew. “Russian Armed Forces: Capabilities”. Congressional Research Service. June 30th, 2020. https://bit.ly/3mJCgEe.

Brzezinski, Zbigniew. Strategic Vision: America and the Crisis of Global Power. New York: Basic Books, 2012.

Charillon, Frédéric. Macron’s France in the World: Strategic Challenges, and a Narrow Path. Oslo: The Norwegian Atlantic Comittee, 2018.

Cladi, Lorenzo, and Andrea Locatelli. “Bandwagoning, Not Balancing: Why Europe Confounds Realism”. Contemporary Security Policy 33, n.° 2 (2012): 264-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2012.693792.

Collier, David. “Understanding Process Tracing”. Political Science and Politics 44, n.° 4 (2011): 823-30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001429.

Corbet, Sylvie. “France’s Macron Urges Europe to Take Charge of Own Defense”. AP News. August 27th, 2018. https://bit.ly/3kTSri4.

Council of the European Union. Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/340 of 6 March 2018 Establishing the List of Projects to Be Developed under PESCO. March 6th, 2018. L 65/24.

—. Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/1797 of 19 November 2018 Amending and Updating Decision (CFSP) 2018/340 Establishing the List of Projects to Be Developed under PESCO. November 21st, 2018. L294/18.

—. “Defence Cooperation: Council Launches 13 New PESCO Projects”. Council of the European Union. November 12th, 2019. https://bit.ly/3LcMkjA.

—. “Notification on Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) to the Council and the High Represantative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy”. Council of the European Union. 2018. https://bit.ly/2FMlLjJ.

—. “Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO)’s Projects - Overview”. Council of the European Union. November 12th, 2019. https://bit.ly/3Fdj4W5.

De France, Olivier. “The French Perspective”. Armament Industry European Research Group. Policy paper 37, February 2019. https://bit.ly/3YCQgNk.

Errera, Philippe. “We Need Coherent Projects Leading to Concrete Results”. European Defence Agency. Accessed March 9th, 2023. https://bit.ly/3L7b10J.

European Union. Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union. Official Journal of the European Communities, C 326/13. October 26th, 2012.

France Ministère des Armées. “European Intervention Initiative”. Ministère des Armées. 2020. https://bit.ly/407tUo0.

Gotkowska, Justyna. “European Strategic Autonomy or European Pillar in NATO?: Germany’s Stance on French Initiatives”. OSW Commentary 320 (2020). https://bit.ly/3ZUk4Gl .

Gressel, Gustav, Kadri Liik, Jeremy Shapiro and Tara Varma. “Emmanuel Macron’s Very Big Idea on Russia”. European Council on Foreign Relations. September 25th, 2019. https://bit.ly/3YANdWc .

Haine, Jean-Yves. ESDP: An Overview. Paris: Institute for Security Studies, 2004.

Howorth, Jolyon. “France, NATO and European Security: Status Quo Unsustainable; New Balance Unattainable”. Politique Étrangère 4 (2002). https://bit.ly/3ZWkBHO.

Ikenberry, G. John. “Woodrow Wilson, the Bush Administration, and the Future of Liberal Internationalism”. In The Crisis of American Foreign Policy: Wilsonianism in the Twenty-First Century, edited by G. John Ikenberry, Thomas Knock, Anne-Marie Slaughter and Tony Smith, 1-24. Princeton, US: Princeton University Press, 2009.

Juncker, Jean-Claude. “Speech by President Jean-Claude Juncker at the Defence and Security Conference Prague: In Defence of Europe”. European Commission. June 9th, 2017. https://bit.ly/420UwJr.

Kaufman, Joyce. “The US Perspective on NATO under Trump: Lessons of the Past and Prospects for the Future”. International Affairs 93, n.° 2 (2017): 251-66. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix009.

Kissinger, Henry. “The End of NATO as We Know It?”. The Washington Post. August 15th, 1999. https://wapo.st/3L7H1So.

Lafont Rapnouil, Manuel, and Jeremy Shapiro. “Macron’s Foreign Policy: Claiming the Tradition”. Brookings. May 8th, 2017. https://bit.ly/3T4WmF5.

Lazarou, Elena, and Alina Dobreva. “Security and Defence”. European Parliament. Briefing, June 2019. https://bit.ly/40cXPfd.

Maas, Heiko. “Speech by Foreign Minister Heiko Maas: ‘Courage to Stand Up for Europe-# EuropeUnited’”. Germany’s Federal Foreign Office. June 13th, 2018. https://bit.ly/2JQ9eh7.

Macron, Emmanuel. “Sorbonne Speech of Emmanuel Macron: Full Text / English Version”. Ouest-France. September 26th, 2017. https://bit.ly/3JrJ2aF.

Mahoney, James. “After KKV: The New Methodology of Qualitative Research”. World Politics 62, n.° 1 (2010): 120-47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887109990220.

Major, Claudia, and Christian Mölling. “France Moves From EU Defense to European Defense”. DGAP Standpunkt 16 (2017). https://bit.ly/41VLNIJ.

Mills, Claire. “The European Intervention Initiative (EII/EI2)”. House of Commons Library. Briefing paper 8432, September 23rd, 2019. https://bit.ly/3J80U9f.

Mölling, Christian, and Claudia Major. “Why Joining France’s European Intervention Initiative Is the Right Decision for Germany”. Egmont. June 15th, 2018. https://bit.ly/3Yxtq9X.

Momtaz, Rym. “Macron’s Eastern Approach to EU Power”. Politico. August 20th, 2019. https://politi.co/2TQhAZ0.

Moulson, Geir. “France’s Macron Urges Better Long-Term Relations With Russia”. USA News. February 15th, 2020. https://bit.ly/3ZD1YsC.

NATO. “A Short History of NATO”. NATO. Accessed March 9th, 2023. https://bit.ly/3LtgjnB.

—. “What Is NATO?”. NATO. Accessed March 9th, 2023. https://bit.ly/2GwhNsD.

Nováky, Niklas. “France’s European Intervention Initiative: Towards a Culture of Burden Sharing”. Wilfried Marten Centre for European Studies. Policy brief, October 2018. https://bit.ly/3YF8CgK .

—. “The EU’s Permanent Structured Cooperation in Defence: Keeping Sleeping Beauty from Snoozing”. European View 17, n.° 1 (2018): 97-104. https://bit.ly/422h1xA.

Owen, John. “Transnational Liberalism and U. S. Primacy”. International Security 26, n.° 3 (2001): 111-52. https://bit.ly/3J4A8ia.

Pachta, Lukáš. “France: Driving Force of the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy?”. Europeum. 2003. https://bit.ly/3YAiNmT.

Pannier, Alice, and Olivier Schmitt. “To Fight Another Day: France between the Fight against Terrorism and Future Warfare”. International Affairs 95, n.° 4 (2019): 897-916. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz050.

Parent, Joseph, and Sebastian Rosato. “Balancing in Neorealism”. International Security 40, n.° 2 (2015): 51-86. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00216.

Paul, T. V. “Soft Balancing in the Age of U. S. Primacy”. International Security 30, n.° 1 (2005): 46-71. https://doi.org/10.1162/0162288054894652.

Pierre, Andrew. Coalitions: Building and Maintenance. The Gulf War, Kosovo, Afghanistan, and the War on Terrorism. Washington DC: Georgtown University Institute for the Study of Diplomacy, 2002.

Ramani, Samuel. “Russia Takes Its Syrian Model of Counterinsurgency to Africa”. Rusi. September 9th, 2020. https://bit.ly/3Ju7hVP.

Schreer, Benjamin. “Trump, NATO and the Future of Europe’s Defence”. RUSI Journal 164, n.° 1 (2019): 10-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2019.1605011.

Snyder, Glenn. Alliance Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997. Stanicek, Branislav. “Turkey: Remodelling the Eastern Mediterranean Conflicting Exploration of Natural Gas Reserves”. European Parliament. Briefing, September 2020. https://bit.ly/3YBBpmu.

Sweeney, Simon, and Neil Winn. “EU Security and Defence Cooperation in Times of Dissent: Analysing PESCO, the European Defence Fund and the European Intervention Initiative (EI2) in the Shadow of Brexit”. Defence Studies 20, n.° 3 (2020): 224-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2020.1778472.

The Economist. “Emmanuel Macron Warns Europe: NATO Is Becoming Brain-Dead”. The Economist. November 7th, 2019. https://econ.st/3mHrO0l.

The International Institute for Strategic Studies. The Military Balance: The Annual Assessment of Global Military Capabilities and Defence Economics. London: IISS, 2018.

Walt, Stephen. “Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power”. International Security 9, n.° 4 (1985): 3-43. https://doi.org/10.2307/2538540.

—. Taming American Power. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 2005.

—. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987. Waltz, Kenneth. “The Emerging Structure of International Politics”. International Security 18, n.° 2 (1993): 44-79. https://bit.ly/3T5MsmJ.

—. Theory of International Politics. Reading, US: Addison-Wesley, 1979.

Witney, Nick. “EU Defence Efforts Miss the Open Goal Again”. European Council on Foreign Relations. November 15th, 2017. https://bit.ly/3kTX3oo.

World Bank. “Military Expenditure (% of GDP) - France”. World Bank. Accessed March 9th, 2023. https://bit.ly/3yxzVyR.

—. “Military Expenditure (Current USD) - France”. World Bank. Accessed March 9th, 2023. https://bit.ly/3ZTvEl5.

Descargas

Publicado

2023-07-20

Cómo citar

Tekir, G. (2023). France-Led Security Balancing against NATO. Comentario Internacional: Revista Del Centro Andino De Estudios Internacionales, (21), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.32719/26312549.2021.21.4
Métricas alternativas