El potencial de la conectividad de la UE a través de las misiones y la especialización inteligente


  • Zane Šime Norwegian University of Science and Technology (Trondheim Ålesund Gjøvik, Norway)



Palabras clave:

relaciones Asia-Europa, conectividad, misiones, especialización inteligente


La innovación orientada a la misión y la especialización inteligente son conceptos conocidos internacionalmente. Tienen el potencial de añadir más profundidad al pensamiento de la Unión Europea y a la modelización de su enfoque de conectividad hacia Asia y el mundo en general. Los marcos políticos y de gobernanza y los instrumentos de aplicación de la especialización inteligente y la innovación existentes podrían aportar a la conectividad las lecciones aprendidas y los resultados de la investigación de diversas partes del mundo. Ambos marcos de innovación e investigación podrían alejar el enfoque de conectividad de la Unión Europea de las controversias vinculadas a la interdependencia armada y la autonomía estratégica, incluido el conjunto de conceptos que acompañan a esta corriente intelectual orientada a la vulnerabilidad. La intensidad de la investigación y el aprendizaje mutuo son elementos que la innovación orientada a la misión y la especialización inteligente podrían aportar al espectro general de dimensiones temáticas y medidas de aplicación del enfoque de la Unión Europea hacia una conexión sostenible y de confianza con Asia y otras partes del mundo.


Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.


Aagaard, Kaare, and Niels Mejlgaard. “Research Policy Transformations and Tensions”. In The Oxford Handbook of Danish Politics, edited by Peter Munk Christiansen, Jørgen Elklit and Peter Nedergaard, 664-81. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.

Anghel, Suzana, Beatrix Immenkamp, Elena Lazarou, Jerôme Saulnier and Alex Wilson. On the Path to “Strategic Autonomy”: The EU in an Evolving Geopolitical Environment. Brussels: European Union, 2020. https://bit.ly/3mEmXgp.

Ansell, Chris. “Network Institutionalism”. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, edited by Sarah Binder, Roderick Rhodes and Bert Rockman, 75-89. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Barroeta, Belén, Javier Gómez, Jonatan Paton, Manuel Palazuelos and Marcelino Cabrera. Innovation and Regional Specialisation in Latin America. Luxembourg: European Union, 2017. http://bit.ly/3Ki12VI.

Becker, William, Marcos Domínguez, Ana Neves, Carlos Tacão and Michaela Saisana. “Exploring the Link between Asia and Europe Connectivity and Sustainable Development”. Research in Globalization 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2021.100045.

Biscop, Sven. “The Power to Engage: Giving Punch to a New EU Global Strategy 2020”. Security Policy Brief 114 (2019). https://bit.ly/3Jpk37T.

Blockmans, Steven. “Why the EU Needs a Geopolitical Commission”. Centre for European Policy Studies. September 15th, 2020. https://bit.ly/3kWN1Tp.

Campbell, T. L. “Basic Science in Mission-Oriented Endeavor”. Science 156, n.° 3775 (1967): 670-2. https://doi.org/10.112/science.156.3775.670.

Carayannis, Elias, and Ruslan Rakhmatullin. “The Quadruple/Quintuple Innovation Helixes and Smart Specialisation Strategies for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in Europe and Beyond”. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 5 (2014): 212-39. https://bit.ly/3ZBQJB0.

Chang, Chia-Chien, and Alan Yang. “Weaponized Interdependence: China’s Economic Statecraft and Social Penetration against Taiwan”. Orbis 64, n.° 2 (2020): 312-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2020.02.002.

Chaniotou, Ninetta, and Zane Šime. “Baltic Sea Region-Wide Research-Business Cooperation: What Benefits for Sparsely Populated Areas and Smart Specialisation?”. European Structural and Investment Funds Journal 6, n.° 3 (2018): 241-52. https://bit.ly/3yoBTlb.

Choer Moraes, Henrique. “The Turn to Managed Interdependence: A Glimpse into the Future of International Economic Law?”. EJIL Talk! August 24th, 2018. https://bit.ly/3J5FysW.

Council of the European Union. A Globally Connected Europe: Council Conclusions (12 July 2021). July 12th, 2021. 10629/21. https://bit.ly/3ZTbI1H.

—. Connecting Europe and Asia: Building Blocks for an EU Strategy. Council conclusions (15 October 2018). October 15th, 2018. 13097/18. https://bit.ly/42c6Jvh.

D’Ambrogio, Enrico. Prospects for EU-Asia Connectivity: The “European way to connectivity”. Brussels: European Union, 2021. https://bit.ly/3yrg04U.

Dosi, Giovanni, Francesco Lamperti, Mariana Mazzucato, Mauro Napoletano and Andrea Roventini. “Mission-Oriented Policies and the ‘Entrepreneurial State’ at Work: An Agent-Based Exploration”. UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose. Working paper, 2021. https://bit.ly/3J6vOPg.

Drezner, Daniel. “The Song Remains the Same: International Relations after COVID-19”. International Organization 74, n.° 51 (2020): 18-35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000351.

Duchâtel, Mathieu, François Godement, Kadri Liik, Jeremy Shapiro, Louisa Slavkova, Angela Stanzel and Vessela Tcherneva. “Eurasian Integration and the EU”. In Absorb and Conquer: An EU Approach to Russian and Chinese Integration in Eurasia, 11-28. London: European Council on Foreign Relations, 2016.

Erokhin, Dmitry. “Comparative Analysis of Digital Development in Central Asian Countries”. OSCE Academy in Bishkek. Policy brief 63, September 2020. https://bit.ly/3YBqjOr.

Esteban, Mario, and Ugo Armanini. “The EU-Japan Connectivity Partnership: A Sustainable Initiative Awaiting Materialisation”. Real Instituto Elcano. February 4th, 2020. https://bit.ly/3Jr1YGF.

European Commission. “1st SMARTER Conference on Smart Specialisation and Territorial Development”. European Commission. Accessed March 8th, 2023. https://bit.ly/3mHc50X.

—. “EU Missions in Horizon Europe”. European Commission. Accessed March 8th, 2023. https://bit.ly/3IV5lnC.

—. Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank: Connecting Europe and Asia. Building Blocks for an EU Strategy. September 19th, 2018. JOIN(2018) 31 final. European Parliament. “Smart Specialisation and Europe’s Growth Agenda”. European Parliament. Accessed March 8th, 2023. https://bit.ly/3JqPkaM.

Farrell, Henry, and Abraham Newman. “Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion”. International Security 44, n.° 1 (2019): 42-79. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00351.

Foray, Dominique, Philip McCann and Raquel Ortega. “Smart Specialization and European Regional Development Policy”. In The Oxford Handbook of Local Competitiveness, edited by David Audretsch, Albert Link and Mary Walshok, 458-80. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

Frederickson, H. George. “Whatever Happened to Public Administration?: Governance, Governance Everywhere”. In The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, edited by Ewan Ferlie, Laurence Lynn and Christopher Pollitt, 282-304. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

Gaens, Bart. “The EU-Asia Connectivity Strategy and Its Impact on Asia-Europe Relations”. In Trade and Economic Connectivity in the Age of Uncertainty, edited by Christian Echle and Megha Sarmah, 19-27. Singapore: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, 2019.

Godehardt, Nadine, and Karoline Postel-Vinay. “Connectivity and Geopolitics: Beware the ‘New Wine in Old Bottles’ Approach”. SWP Comment 35 (2020). https://bit.ly/3YAaes0.

Griniece, Elina, Alasdair Reid and Vladimir Cvijanovi?. High Level Value Chain Mapping in the Baltic Sea Region: Pilot Exercise on Circular Bioeconomy. Brussels: EFIS, 2020.

Guzzo, Fabrizio, and Carlo Gianelle. Assessing Smart Specialisation: Governance. Luxembourg: European Commission, 2021.

Holzer, Constantin. “Identity Narratives in China and the EU’s Economic Diplomacy: Comparing the BRI and the EU Connectivity Strategy for Asia”. In Chinese National Identity in the Age of Globalisation, edited by Lu Zhouxiang, 183-202. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020.

Huang, Can, Xiao Jin and Lanhua Li. RIO Country Report 2015: China. Sevilla: European Union, 2016.

Jakóbowski, Jakub. “Chinese-Led Regional Multilateralism in Central and Eastern Europe, Africa and Latin America: 16 + 1, FOCAC, and CCF”. Journal of Contemporary China 27, n.° 113 (2018): 659-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2018.1458055.

Kallas, Kaja, and Charles Michel. “Trusted Connectivity: The European Value Proposition”. European Council. September 14th, 2021. https://bit.ly/3Yywen6.

Klerkx, Laurens, and Stephanie Begemann. “Supporting Food Systems Transformation: The What, Why, Who, Where and How of Mission-Oriented Agricultural Innovation Systems”. Agricultural Systems 184 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102901.

Landabaso, Mikel. “From S3 to S4: Towards Sustainable Smart Specialisation Strategies”. European Commission. February 27th, 2020. https://bit.ly/3kZGRSp.

Lecomte, Carole. “Ambassador Romana Vlahutin: The EU’s Connectivity Strategy”. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. May 10th, 2019. https://bit.ly/2VtOC5g.

Leino, Johanna, and Alison Hunter. Smart Specialisation in the Baltic Sea Region: Learning towards Macro-Regional Specialisation. Tampere, FI: Interreg / European Union, 2020.

Lim, Darren, Victor Ferguson and Rosa Bishop. “Chinese Outbound Tourism as an Instrument of Economic Statecraft”. Journal of Contemporary China 29, n.° 126 (2020): 916-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2020.1744390.

Mazzucato, Mariana. “Catch-Up and Mission-Oriented Innovation”. In How Nations Learn: Technological Learning, Industrial Policy, and Catch-Up, edited by Arkebe

Oqubay and Kenichi Ohno, 63-81. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.

—. Governing Missions in the European Union. Luxembourg: European Union, 2019.

—. “Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy: Challenges and Opportunities”. UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose. Working paper, September 2017. https://bit.ly/3l5L6vB.

—. “Mission-Oriented Public Procurement: International Examples”. UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose. Policy report, 2020. https://bit.ly/42b3S5I.

—. Mission-Oriented Research & Innovation in the European Union: A Problem-Solving Approach to Fuel Innovation-Led Growth. Brussels: European Commission, 2018.

—, Antonio Andreoni and Rowan Conway. “Mission-Oriented Innovation in the USA. Shaping Markets toward Grand Challenges: A New Industrial Policy Frontier”.

UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose. Policy paper 1, June 2021. https://bit.ly/3ZyZlbl.

—, and George Dibb. A Mission-Oriented Vision for Innovation-Led Economic Growth. London: UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, 2018.

—, and Olga Mikheeva. “The EIB and the New EU Missions Framework: Opportunities and Lessons from the EIB’s Advisory Support to the Circular Economy”. UCL

Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose. Policy report, November 2020. https://bit.ly/3JqbpWX.

—, and Caetano Penna. “The Rise of Mission-Oriented State Investment Banks: The Cases of Germany’s KfW and Brazil’s BNDES”. Science Policy Research Unit. Working paper, 2015-2016. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2744613.

Mendonça, Hudson, Teresia van Aduard and Marcus de Araújo. “Working towards a Framework Based on Mission-Oriented Practices for Assessing Renewable Energy Innovation Policies”. Journal of Cleaner Production 193 (2018): 709-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.064.

Minghao, Zhao. “The Belt and Road Initiative and its Implications for China-Europe Relations”. The International Spectator 51, n.° 4 (2016): 109-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2016.1235819.

Mohan, Garima, and Darshana Baruah. “Charting EU-India Cooperation on Connectivity”. EU-India Think Tanks Twinning Initiative. January 7th, 2019. https://bit.ly/3L9I8kk.

Narlikar, Amrita. “A Grand Bargain to Revive the WTO”. Centre for International Governance Innovation. May 11th, 2020. https://bit.ly/3YGiZkI.

—. “Managing the World of Weaponized Interdependence”. The Security Times. February 2020. https://bit.ly/3kSUov7.

Nichols, Rodney. “Mission-Oriented R & D: Senator Mansfield’s Questions Sharpen Congressional Uncertainties About Federal R & D Patterns”. Science 172, n.° 3978 (1971): 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.172.3978.29.

Nordic Council of Ministers. Ten Trends For the Sustainable Bioeconomy in the Nordic Arctic and Baltic Sea Region. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers, 2020.

Nye, Joseph Samuel, Jr. “Power and Interdependence with China”. The Washington Quarterly 43, n.° 1 (2020): 7-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2020.1734303.

Ohanyan, Anna. “Network Institutionalism and NGO Studies”. International Studies Perspectives 13, n.° 4 (2012): 366-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2012.00488.x.

—. “Regional Fracture and Its Intractability in World Politics: The Case of the Late Ottoman Empire”. Nationalities Papers 50, n.° 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2021.27.

—. “The Effects of Global Policy Networks on Peacebuilding: Framework of Evaluation”. Global Society 24, n.° 4 (2010): 529-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2010.508365.

Okano-Heijmans, Maaike. “How to Strenghten Europe’s Agenda on Digital Connectivity”. Clingendael. Policy brief, July 2019. https://bit.ly/3YB0FJJ.

—, and Jagannath Panda. Managing Connectivity Conflict: EU-India Cooperation and China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Stockholm: Institute for Security & Development Policy, 2018.

—, and Wilhelm Vosse. “Promoting Open and Inclusive Connectivity: The Case for Digital Development Cooperation”. Research in Globalization 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2021.100061.

Pascha, Werner. “Belts, Roads, and Regions: The Dynamics of Chinese and Japanese Infrastructure Connectivity Initiatives and Europe’s Responses”. Asian Development Bank Institute. Working paper 1114, April 2020. https://bit.ly/3T1VvFc.

Pepe, Jacopo Maria. “Connectivity in Post-COVID-19 Eurasia: Chances for the EU”. German Council on Foreign Relations. September 1st, 2020. https://bit.ly/3Fehzqv.

Rao, P. V. “‘Development through Connectivity’: India’s Maritime Narrative”. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region 15, n.° 3 (2019): 245-64 https://doi.org/10.1080/19480881.2019.1640578.

Reid, Alasdair, Elina Griniece and Vladimir Cvijanovi?. High Level Value Chain Mapping in the Baltic Sea Region: Guidance Manual. Brussels: EFIS, 2020.

Ries, Tomas. “Security Aspects of Policy”. Security Policy Brief 115 (2019). https://bit.ly/3ZvgJhp.

Robinson, Douglas and Mariana Mazzucato. “The Evolution of Mission-Oriented Policies: Exploring Changing Market Creating Policies in the US and European Space Sector”. Research Policy 48, n.° 4 (2019): 936-948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.005.

Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés. “The Research and Innovation Divide in the EU and Its Economic Consequences”. European Commission. Working paper, 2020. https://bit.ly/3l0UeBS.

Russell, Martin. “Connectivity in Central Asia: Reconnecting the Silk Road”. European Parliament. Briefing, April 2nd, 2019. https://bit.ly/3F9Q7Ky.

Rzayev, Ayaz. “Towards Greater Connectivity: The South Caucasus as a Railway Hub between the EU and China”. UNU-CRIS. Policy brief 1, 2019, https://bit.ly/3l0ZVje.

Saari, Sinikukka. “Connecting the Dots: Challenges to EU Connectivity in Central Asia”. European Union Institute for Security Studies. Brief, June 2019. https://bit.ly/3Jt4Ra6.

Schlüter, Karen. “(Regional) Smart Specialisation: A New Push for Regionalism in Europe?”. L’Europe en Formation 1, n.° 379 (2016): 180-194. https://bit.ly/41YIi4k.

Šime, Zane. “EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: A New Space for a Study of Novel Forms of Diplomacy”. Regions & Cohesion 10, n.° 3 (2020): 108-24. https://doi.org/10.3167/reco.2020.100310.

—. “Multi-Level Governance of Innovation and Smart Specialisation”. Baltic TRAM. October 31st, 2017. https://bit.ly/3ZS2oLv.

—. “Science Diplomacy in the Context of the EU-India Strategic Partnership: Looking beyond the European Sandbagging Contest”. Science Diplomacy. India’s Global Digest of Multidisciplinary Science 4, n.° 4 (2021). https://bit.ly/3J6TyCK.

Technology Park Ljubljana. “Ganesha: EU/SLO-India Smart Specialisation Initiative for Internationalization”. Technology Park Ljubljana. February 26th, 2018. https://bit. ly/3l0IPlA.

Tocci, Nathalie. “Interview with Nathalie Tocci on the Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy”. The International Spectator 51, n.° 3 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2016.1216744.

UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose. “IIPP Taking the Lead in Latin America on Post-COVID Recovery”. UCL. July 29th, 2020. https://bit.ly/3L42AmS.

Vlahutin, Romana. “Reconnected: How the EU Can Assert Its Sovereignty after the Pandemic”. European Council on Foreign Relations. April 21st, 2020. https://bit.ly/3ZUtSjU.

—. “Sustainable Connectivity: The European way”. Keynote speech in the Asia-Europe Sustainable Connectivity Scientific Conference (AESCON), March 22nd-24th, 2020.

Widmann, Manuel. “The EU Connectivity Strategy: Putting Words into Action”. European Institute for Asian Studies. Briefing paper 2, August 2021. https://bit.ly/3Yvpbvv.




Cómo citar

Šime, Z. (2023). El potencial de la conectividad de la UE a través de las misiones y la especialización inteligente. Comentario Internacional. Revista Del Centro Andino De Estudios Internacionales, (21), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.32719/26312549.2021.21.3
Métricas alternativas